Help!I'maRock!
Mediocringly Derivative
companies like suhr and anderson sell the myth that their is no difference cause they are too cheap to pay the higher costs of shooting nitro. plain and simple.
:dh:
companies like suhr and anderson sell the myth that their is no difference cause they are too cheap to pay the higher costs of shooting nitro. plain and simple.
I own one guitar with a nitro finish...my Les Paul.
I'd really like to see an actual figure on how much more it costs to spray nitro vs poly. I know the actual laquer isn't any more expensive, because I've bought it to spray before.
In my experience, nitro is actually a little easier to work with than poly because it blends and melts better than poly, which means that you end up with less orange peel and less sanding in the end. It is also a lot easier to buff since it's a softer finish.
My new PRS has nitro, my other 2 have poly. All 3 sound and play great. The new one does have the best tone of the 3...bit it also has higher grade woods and better pickups, so I doubt one could say what, if anything, the nitro contributes. It does contribute a slightly sticky feel at this point, but I know that'll fade.
its probably the pickups.
I figure they're the biggest factor.
what's in there compared to the others?
It's got the new 57/08s. The Mira has Mira pickups, and the CE22 has the Dragon IIs.
i thought the 57/08s and the Mira were supposed to be close?
57/08s are PAF clones, right?
Is 'soundcreation' the latest alt for our good friend Wayne Vinson/Splawn Darts?? If not it should be. Same BS statements masquerading as absolute facts.
i doubt it. none of the same mis-spellings.