I would imagine a big university like Penn State has all kinds of protocols for dealing with this kind of stuff. I would imagine that tell their employees to report things to the administration and let their public relation people deal with them in order to control the public relation aspect. So reporting the matter to the school president was probably the procedure that the school employees are told to follow. I think the blame is on them more the the coach. They were more worried about their reputation than the kids.
On a side note, who witness a kid getting raped and doesn't beat the dog shit out of the guy on the spot? Had I witnessed that they would have had to scrap that guy off of the locker room floor.
I don't know all the details, but I do know this. in 1998 the district attorney in the Penn State area chose not to prosecute Sandusky for sexual abuse on kids. To me, this says that the Penn State officials went to the authorities. That DA went missing later, his car was found in a lake. So I am a little puzzled by all of this. If the DA chose not to prosecute this, why is Paterno being force out now?
I hadnt read that. Certainly changes things.
What a complete fuckin' deplorable shitbag of a human being he is. There is NO WAY he didn't know Sandusky was raping kids. He should at the very least be facing a laundry list of felony charges himself.
Disgusting how his "supporters" are so willing to stand by him. I guess college football (Even for the rabid fans who didn't even attend the school) is more important than the innocence of helpless children.
What a complete fuckin' deplorable shitbag of a human being he is. There is NO WAY he didn't know Sandusky was raping kids. He should at the very least be facing a laundry list of felony charges himself.
Disgusting how his "supporters" are so willing to stand by him. I guess college football (Even for the rabid fans who didn't even attend the school) is more important than the innocence of helpless children.
Guess the media has presented you with enough facts to come to that conclusion. I'm not as quick to jump to such harsh judgment so fast I suppose.
What? He never said he didn't know. Did you read the story? He was informed of the incident. Removed the guy from his duties with the team and reported him to his athletic director per university policy. The only thing he didn't t do was call the cops himself. What exactly should he be charged with? He and the graduate assistant that witnessed it went to the boys parents and informed them. What else should be do? Are you saying every employer is responsible for every action of their employees? I can only go on media reports but I'm not seeing anything out of line with his actions.