Grammys

Now that Lady Gaga has gone through her next pupal metamorphasis, she's one step closer to actually becoming madonna. :embarrassed:
 
I haven't watched the Grammys in a long time but I was home alone (Mrs. Hump was at the local NARAS Grammy party) so I sat down and watched some of it.

It was OK I guess.
 
reverend1 said:
I'm not really sure what Lady GaGa looks like, because she is always covered in weird shit. But from what I can tell she is not very attrative, so I think I rather just pass.
Click to expand...

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/celebrity/men-still-trying-to-fancy-lady-gaga-201003182573/

MEN are still really trying to find the constantly-naked Lady Gaga attractive, it emerged last night.

Image
The telephone hat does actually help a little bit
In recent weeks, the American singer-attention seeker's ubiquitous breasts and buttocks have been causing increasing tension among British men, many of whom are struggling to understand why they do not find them even remotely arousing.

Man Tom Logan said: "They are perfectly good, female human breasts and buttocks. Normally that combo alone, even if grafted onto a toad's back, would be sufficient to heat my juice.

"Plus in her new video she wanks a marmoset while dressed as a kind of fetish combine harvester, or something.

"And yet... and yet, try as I might, I simply cannot muster any sexual enthusiasm for La Gaga. It's weird, it's not like I'm sophisticated enough to be deterred by her intensely irritating personality or the fact that she has the aspect of a young Pauline Fowler."

He added: "There's just something about her that's subtly revolting, like Ginster's Buffet Bars."

Teacher Norman Steele said: "I'm a bit of a pervert and also a keen amateur oceanologist, so Gaga – a dirty girl who frequently dresses like a crustacean – should be right up my staircase.

"Yet somehow I can't even crack a semi over her, it's most perplexing. Am I on the turn?"

Dr Nikki Hollis, of the Institute for Studies, said: "My guess is it's probably because she looks like the personification of some weird STD from the 23rd century.

"Plus she's got that Peaches Geldof thing where her face looks like it's been painted onto a deflating balloon."
Click to expand...
 
Is it just me or did Jagger look pissed off at his bass player for trying to upstage him?

It looked like he pushed him away a couple of times.
 
I think Jagger pushed the bassist because he was playing a custom retro, instead of his real vintage.
Or are guitars from the fifties and sixties considered historic?
 
Arcade Fire is one of those bands where I'll either love the song or completely hate it. Wake Up is still my favourite. :embarrassed:
 
I saw the BOB, Bruno Mars medley which wasn't as exciting as they tried to make it, with all the fireworks and smoke and all.
There was some guy trying to fake playing guitar, with the red 335. Why did they bother having him do that?
It's throughout the bit, but the guy just starts goofing with it at about 7:15 of this clip:

Not to mention the network trying to jam Justin Bieber down your throat all night. That must be SOME PR firm working with him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm just wondering, in case someone knows. The winner of song of the year was 'Need You Now' from Lady Antebellum. That song was released and charted in August 2009 - how can it be song of the year for 2010?

:shrug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top