Danhedonia
Noted duckfat enthusiast
And what I mean by "the way of Gibson" is ass-hattery: shameless "lifestyle brand building" bull pukky. TLDR / Early signs of the apocalypse:
- Fender are heading into the video lesson business *
- Website is now all about celebribabble bullshit
- New guitar designs are all about colors and fashion, not .... well, updates on guitars
Video Lessons
* - YES I know where I'm posting. I'm very appreciative of the value of Mark Wein-type video lessons, and really like a lot of the free YouTube lessons, too, as a way to shortcut around having to figure out the riffs for a fun cover. But Fender's plan is to sell 'access to' non-individualized content. Good luck with that. Because I think it's been pretty proven that people won't pay for that, over, say, the last 15 years. It's free on YouTube already; wrong business model, Fender. Worse, this is the brainchild of a "new exciting executive" (already forgot his name) who - wait for it - has no background in music or guitars.
This is the hallmark sign of how companies get destroyed; it's a simple step by step process.
Step 1 - get a board that doesn't care at all about the long term. "WE MUST GROW THE TOP LINE" becomes the shrill, utterly unsupported by logic call to arms.
Step 2 - find some 'business development genius' who grew someone else's top line and hire them. Never mind why that someone else's top line grew, or what the eventual effect was. Simply: s/he did it over there, now do it over here.
Step 3 - Pay this imbecile stupid money to create a fantasy of where all the growth is coming from. This is usually the saddest step, because the greedheads who started all of this (step 1 - the board) have a weird fetish for new markets - it gets them hard/wet, more so than simply managing a company well and profitably.
Step 4 - Roll this out to the troops with confetti. Usually there's a 'new, energetic' (read: kinda hot gal / yes-woman) leading this marketing 'charge.' Ask good questions and get put on a list of "not being on board" and/or "not willing to commit."
Step 5 - Leverage a bunch of debt against these "surefire growth plans." In the case of the board and the new "genius," pay yourself FIRST. This is basically looting the till, and is now done all the time in corporate America.
Step 6 - Watch the talent leave as they realize that they are in a no-win position. Browbeat those who stay behind.
Step 7 - Fail to grow business. Blame employees.
Step 8 - Lather. Rinse. Go to Aspen. Repeat.
Hoping I misread the breathless corporate announcements, but sadly, I don't think so.
The Website:
Has more breathless bullshit about "master builders" than any one person should ever feel comfortable looking at. Currently on the site right this second:
* 1,000 Diamonds: Master Builder Yuriy Shishkov On His Stunning Studioliner
(stunning if only for the way the complete lack of taste echoes the scraggly pube-stache of this not-interesting creature)
* Master Builder Jason Smith On His 30th Anniversary Esquire C.C. MBJS
* See the New 2017 Limited Edition Exotic Collection
* Master Builder Scott Buehl Showcases His Frosted Duco Strat
Master Builder Dennis Galuszka Showcases His Hot Rodded Jazzmaster
Master Builder Dale Wilson On His Forest Green 30th Anniversary Strat
First Look: The Fender Custom Shop Founders Design Project
... it goes on quite a bit. Note how the site is shifting away from the already-irritating worship of whatever has recently fallen out of sponsored artists' anuses, and plunged ahead courageously into the land of complete self-worship. And that self-worship is centered on $4,000+ guitars. Because c'mon guy, you know you want one ....
The Guitars
Probably makes sense that those are almost an afterthought. I'll give credit where it's due: Fender has come out with some fun new guitars. However, the 'fun' is mostly in the aesthetics (color choices; body shapes) and in many instances comes at the expense of details that actual players appreciate:
- New American Pro Jazzmaster simply eliminates the rhythm circuit.
- Lots and lots of MIM stuff now streeting for $800+. Some of these are indeed terrific guitars, and I can see some inflation from the '00's justified, but not this much, especially given the overall landscape of the guitar market.
- Guitars are getting simpler - corners cut? The new Mustangs and DuoSonics are a great example. They're terrific guitars and FMIC should feel good about them. However, for $499, I would wish for well-finished frets (all of the $500 new MIMs I've played have nearly-thorny fret ends, and others have found this as well), and a real tremolo system (these are Fenders! c'mon ....)
Nope. No can do. In fact, FMIC has done one thing that really shows me a lot about what their priorities are: tons of guitars in recent years that leverage the emotion of the legacy shapes but have "more modern" configurations. Usually this means cheap humbuckers instead of carefully made single coils, and a stop tail instead of a fancier bridge. We won't even get into the quality of the metals used.
Has Fender looked ruefully at Guitar Center's books and made a bold play for the previously Gibson-bound Dental Dollar?
Are they about to tell you that making music is not about expressing yourself, but having a carefully-mediated 'experience' (that isn't really complete until you buy a $4,000 guitar)?
- Fender are heading into the video lesson business *
- Website is now all about celebribabble bullshit
- New guitar designs are all about colors and fashion, not .... well, updates on guitars
Video Lessons
* - YES I know where I'm posting. I'm very appreciative of the value of Mark Wein-type video lessons, and really like a lot of the free YouTube lessons, too, as a way to shortcut around having to figure out the riffs for a fun cover. But Fender's plan is to sell 'access to' non-individualized content. Good luck with that. Because I think it's been pretty proven that people won't pay for that, over, say, the last 15 years. It's free on YouTube already; wrong business model, Fender. Worse, this is the brainchild of a "new exciting executive" (already forgot his name) who - wait for it - has no background in music or guitars.
This is the hallmark sign of how companies get destroyed; it's a simple step by step process.
Step 1 - get a board that doesn't care at all about the long term. "WE MUST GROW THE TOP LINE" becomes the shrill, utterly unsupported by logic call to arms.
Step 2 - find some 'business development genius' who grew someone else's top line and hire them. Never mind why that someone else's top line grew, or what the eventual effect was. Simply: s/he did it over there, now do it over here.
Step 3 - Pay this imbecile stupid money to create a fantasy of where all the growth is coming from. This is usually the saddest step, because the greedheads who started all of this (step 1 - the board) have a weird fetish for new markets - it gets them hard/wet, more so than simply managing a company well and profitably.
Step 4 - Roll this out to the troops with confetti. Usually there's a 'new, energetic' (read: kinda hot gal / yes-woman) leading this marketing 'charge.' Ask good questions and get put on a list of "not being on board" and/or "not willing to commit."
Step 5 - Leverage a bunch of debt against these "surefire growth plans." In the case of the board and the new "genius," pay yourself FIRST. This is basically looting the till, and is now done all the time in corporate America.
Step 6 - Watch the talent leave as they realize that they are in a no-win position. Browbeat those who stay behind.
Step 7 - Fail to grow business. Blame employees.
Step 8 - Lather. Rinse. Go to Aspen. Repeat.
Hoping I misread the breathless corporate announcements, but sadly, I don't think so.
The Website:
Has more breathless bullshit about "master builders" than any one person should ever feel comfortable looking at. Currently on the site right this second:
* 1,000 Diamonds: Master Builder Yuriy Shishkov On His Stunning Studioliner
(stunning if only for the way the complete lack of taste echoes the scraggly pube-stache of this not-interesting creature)
* Master Builder Jason Smith On His 30th Anniversary Esquire C.C. MBJS
* See the New 2017 Limited Edition Exotic Collection
* Master Builder Scott Buehl Showcases His Frosted Duco Strat
Master Builder Dennis Galuszka Showcases His Hot Rodded Jazzmaster
Master Builder Dale Wilson On His Forest Green 30th Anniversary Strat
First Look: The Fender Custom Shop Founders Design Project
... it goes on quite a bit. Note how the site is shifting away from the already-irritating worship of whatever has recently fallen out of sponsored artists' anuses, and plunged ahead courageously into the land of complete self-worship. And that self-worship is centered on $4,000+ guitars. Because c'mon guy, you know you want one ....
The Guitars
Probably makes sense that those are almost an afterthought. I'll give credit where it's due: Fender has come out with some fun new guitars. However, the 'fun' is mostly in the aesthetics (color choices; body shapes) and in many instances comes at the expense of details that actual players appreciate:
- New American Pro Jazzmaster simply eliminates the rhythm circuit.
- Lots and lots of MIM stuff now streeting for $800+. Some of these are indeed terrific guitars, and I can see some inflation from the '00's justified, but not this much, especially given the overall landscape of the guitar market.
- Guitars are getting simpler - corners cut? The new Mustangs and DuoSonics are a great example. They're terrific guitars and FMIC should feel good about them. However, for $499, I would wish for well-finished frets (all of the $500 new MIMs I've played have nearly-thorny fret ends, and others have found this as well), and a real tremolo system (these are Fenders! c'mon ....)
Nope. No can do. In fact, FMIC has done one thing that really shows me a lot about what their priorities are: tons of guitars in recent years that leverage the emotion of the legacy shapes but have "more modern" configurations. Usually this means cheap humbuckers instead of carefully made single coils, and a stop tail instead of a fancier bridge. We won't even get into the quality of the metals used.
Has Fender looked ruefully at Guitar Center's books and made a bold play for the previously Gibson-bound Dental Dollar?
Are they about to tell you that making music is not about expressing yourself, but having a carefully-mediated 'experience' (that isn't really complete until you buy a $4,000 guitar)?
