speakerjones
my hat is all
nope
I understand they're supposed to be quite good guitars.
The looks of this one however...bloody hell, no.![]()
I don't understand...the overwhelming majority on this board do not like relic'd guitars. This one is not only heavily relic'd but imo looks like a poor relic job all around, yet I'm seeing a lot of people liking this guitar save for the headstock......am I missing something here?
I don't understand...the overwhelming majority on this board do not like relic'd guitars. This one is not only heavily relic'd but imo looks like a poor relic job all around, yet I'm seeing a lot of people liking this guitar save for the headstock......am I missing something here?
I think the finish was supposed to replicate something more like a melted paint job rather than a relic. Not quite sure about the stripped arm-rest area...maybe something their actual player roster liked? Even with that, this is an immaculately finished undistressed guitar finish that is clearly not to the liking of many here. Most of the "accolades" (barring my own) that I'm reading are talking about the excellent reputation of Tyler's guitars, with very little enthusiasm for the aesthetics.
Different strokes for different folks. The finish kind of reminds me of the layered and sanded (then sealed) finishes that ESP was doing for a while. I actually dug those in general but found the most famous version to be too bright:
![]()
I can see it's not a relic now....I'm looking at it on my phone and didn't really look closely.It's not a relic. People hate on the Tyler headstock, but with the exception of maybe one or two, nobody is buying it because of the price.